On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 10:03 AM Mathias Gibbens <gib...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 22:40 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 10:28 PM Mathias Gibbens <gib...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Anthony, > > > > > > A few weeks ago you uploaded a new version of golang-google-protobuf > > > to unstable which caused a FTBFS in golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5 > > > v1.5.3 [1,2,3]. This has been blocking the transition of various golang > > > packages from unstable to testing. > > > > > > I've verified that v1.5.4 of golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5 builds > > > fine on my amd64 system. `build-rdeps golang-github-golang-protobuf-1- > > > 5-dev` identifies 219 rdeps in main, so I haven't kicked off a `ratt` > > > run testing for any build regressions with the newer version yet. > > > > > > > This is a known regression in 1.5.3, see > > https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/1596#issuecomment-1981208282 > > Since that appears to be the only change in v1.5.4, would there be > any concerns with uploading that version to unstable? This breakage is > starting to cause FTBFS bugs to be filed against affected packages, > such as hugo (#1069371). > > Mathias
Hi Reinhard, Mathias and Shengjing, Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and sorry for my late response! Thank you also for your detailed investigation! Very much appreciated! I don't see any concern uploading v1.5.4 especially how it fixes the regression and FTBFS with v1.5.3, and I'll be uploading golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5 1.5.4-1 very shortly. Cheers, Anthony
