Your message dated Sun, 28 Apr 2024 17:05:59 +0000
with message-id <e1s17yr-0005t0...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1066851: fixed in raku-readline 0.1.6-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066851,
regarding don't hard-code the name of the shared library
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1066851: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066851
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:raku-readline
Version: 0.1.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie

the package build-depends on libreadline8, and depends on it. The name was recently changed to libreadline8t64. Please don't hard-code it, but try to b-d on libreadline-dev, and derive the name of the shared library package from the libreadline-dev package.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: raku-readline
Source-Version: 0.1.6-3.1
Done: Dominique Dumont <d...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
raku-readline, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1066...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Dumont <d...@debian.org> (supplier of updated raku-readline package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:51:30 +0200
Source: raku-readline
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1.6-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Rakudo Maintainers <pkg-rakudo-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Dominique Dumont <d...@debian.org>
Closes: 1066851
Changes:
 raku-readline (0.1.6-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Debian Janitor ]
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Apply multi-arch hints. + raku-readline: Drop Multi-Arch: same.
 .
   [ Dominique Dumont ]
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * control: B-D on libreadline-dev (Closes: #1066851)
   * remove myself from Uploaders
   * rules: compute Depend value of readline lib
Checksums-Sha1:
 9946ee505486bd45b9fbe8b5c589ed54af4cdf0a 2104 raku-readline_0.1.6-3.1.dsc
 71b9ccbcea24250f883317c64a00ff71d7a14249 6236 
raku-readline_0.1.6-3.1.debian.tar.xz
 862217cfb9f57cb7a83894505334d69b2a0f174d 10243 
raku-readline_0.1.6-3.1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 cb0720e69a829c8df8cc017aaa8f78a7bdac1b2ce365b4e96b02624947fe5d6a 2104 
raku-readline_0.1.6-3.1.dsc
 1ffbff569694c76773394c1647d97518a510b941729eb62feba87cd06d28d22a 6236 
raku-readline_0.1.6-3.1.debian.tar.xz
 2e55c6b3af7fca685a6f771f7533b809366621f9e60906dd0c779880cb71d0fb 10243 
raku-readline_0.1.6-3.1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 53af7d9faa2eaf8be1f1653c07ff5221 2104 interpreters optional 
raku-readline_0.1.6-3.1.dsc
 6e7c8737f0434c9f3b17f94858bc8aac 6236 interpreters optional 
raku-readline_0.1.6-3.1.debian.tar.xz
 bc1d4ad249cf16a691fcd938486913c6 10243 interpreters optional 
raku-readline_0.1.6-3.1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=1CjK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpTaKPi0F5go.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to