On May 29, 2024 at 4:04:13 PM, Bastian Germann <b...@debian.org> wrote:
> I suggest fq renames the binary because it was introduced over 4 years > later and has only been in one release so far. > Both packages have very low usage acc to popcon, but for fq the fq binary is the entire point of the package, whereas for nq, the fq binary seems to only be a small part of the functionality of the package. Therefore, I think that nq should rename the fq binary. Stephen
