Your message dated Sat, 15 Jun 2024 08:17:15 +0200
with message-id <fb540c14-f6a2-4259-85c7-697816ae2...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: ppx-expect: FTBFS in sid
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073200,
regarding ppx-expect: FTBFS in sid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1073200: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073200
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ppx-expect
Version: 0.16.0-5
Severity: serious
Hello, after the new round of ocaml updates, the package started FTBFS.
I noticed 0.17.0 is out
(cd _build/default && /usr/bin/ocamlc.opt -w -40 -g -bin-annot -I
evaluator/.ppx_expect_evaluator.objs/byte -I /usr/lib/ocaml/base -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/base/base_internalhash_types -I /usr/lib/ocaml/base/caml -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/base/shadow_stdlib -I /usr/lib/ocaml/jane-street-headers -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_compare/runtime-lib -I /usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_enumerate/runtime-lib -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_hash/runtime-lib -I /usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_inline_test/config -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_inline_test/runtime-lib -I /usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_sexp_conv/runtime-lib
-I /usr/lib/ocaml/ppxlib/print_diff -I /usr/lib/ocaml/re -I /usr/lib/ocaml/seq -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/sexplib0 -I /usr/lib/ocaml/stdio -I /usr/lib/ocaml/time_now -I
collector/.expect_test_collector.objs/byte -I common/.expect_test_common.objs/byte -I
config/types/.expect_test_config_types.objs/byte -I
make-corrected-file/.make_corrected_file.objs/byte -I
matcher/.expect_test_matcher.objs/byte -intf-suffix .ml -no-alias-deps -o
evaluator/.ppx_expect_evaluator.objs/byte/ppx_expect_evaluator.cmo -c -impl
evaluator/ppx_expect_evaluator.ml)
File "evaluator/ppx_expect_evaluator.ml", line 82, characters 6-10:
82 | | None -> File.initial_dir ()
^^^^
content of that file was removed in
https://github.com/janestreet/ppx_expect/commit/f613355a6bc949ec7e6fa8e8d62604aa503cac09#diff-b3af3e6c316a3aadcb636cb79d80da1220d2565c5cbfd03d1cecd44af0f744dd
G.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.17.0-1
Le 14/06/2024 à 14:12, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
Source: ppx-expect
Version: 0.16.0-5
Severity: serious
Hello, after the new round of ocaml updates, the package started FTBFS.
I noticed 0.17.0 is out
(cd _build/default && /usr/bin/ocamlc.opt -w -40 -g -bin-annot -I
evaluator/.ppx_expect_evaluator.objs/byte -I /usr/lib/ocaml/base -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/base/base_internalhash_types -I /usr/lib/ocaml/base/caml
-I /usr/lib/ocaml/base/shadow_stdlib -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/jane-street-headers -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_compare/runtime-lib -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_enumerate/runtime-lib -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_hash/runtime-lib -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_inline_test/config -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_inline_test/runtime-lib -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_sexp_conv/runtime-lib -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/ppxlib/print_diff -I /usr/lib/ocaml/re -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/seq -I /usr/lib/ocaml/sexplib0 -I /usr/lib/ocaml/stdio -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/time_now -I collector/.expect_test_collector.objs/byte -I
common/.expect_test_common.objs/byte -I
config/types/.expect_test_config_types.objs/byte -I
make-corrected-file/.make_corrected_file.objs/byte -I
matcher/.expect_test_matcher.objs/byte -intf-suffix .ml -no-alias-deps
-o evaluator/.ppx_expect_evaluator.objs/byte/ppx_expect_evaluator.cmo -c
-impl evaluator/ppx_expect_evaluator.ml)
File "evaluator/ppx_expect_evaluator.ml", line 82, characters 6-10:
82 | | None -> File.initial_dir ()
^^^^
content of that file was removed in
https://github.com/janestreet/ppx_expect/commit/f613355a6bc949ec7e6fa8e8d62604aa503cac09#diff-b3af3e6c316a3aadcb636cb79d80da1220d2565c5cbfd03d1cecd44af0f744dd
G.
--- End Message ---
