Your message dated Wed, 03 Jul 2024 06:48:57 +0000
with message-id <e1sotnv-00dejd...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1074718: fixed in binutils-mingw-w64 11.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1074718,
regarding binutils-mingw-w64: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:71: unpack] 
Error 1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1074718: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074718
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Version: 11.5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> tar xf /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.42.50.tar.*
> rm -rf /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/upstream
> mv binutils-* /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/upstream
> patch -d /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/upstream -R -p1 < 
> /usr/src/binutils/patches/001_ld_makefile_patch.patch
> patching file ld/Makefile.am
> patching file ld/Makefile.in
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 585 (offset 2 lines).
> QUILT_SERIES=debian/patches/series QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches quilt push -a
> Applying patch debian/patches/testsuite-timeout.patch
> patching file upstream/gas/testsuite/lib/gas-defs.exp
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 343 (offset 13 lines).
> 
> Applying patch debian/patches/dont-run-objcopy.patch
> patching file upstream/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 703 (offset 1 line).
> 
> Applying patch debian/patches/disable-flags.patch
> patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pe.em
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 286.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 306 (offset -78 lines).
> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file upstream/ld/emultempl/pe.em
> patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pep.em
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 326 (offset -73 lines).
> Patch debian/patches/disable-flags.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
> make[1]: *** [debian/rules:71: unpack] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/07/02/binutils-mingw-w64_11.5_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240702;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240702&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Source-Version: 11.6
Done: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
binutils-mingw-w64, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1074...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> (supplier of updated binutils-mingw-w64 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:35:46 +0200
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Architecture: source
Version: 11.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>
Closes: 1074718
Changes:
 binutils-mingw-w64 (11.6) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Adjust for the forthcoming release; closes: #1074718:
     - fix disable-flags.patch;
     - drop non-deterministic-tests.patch, merged upstream.
   * Install UCRT man pages.
   * Add a Lintian override for usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32ucrt/.
   * Standards-Version 4.7.0, no further change required.
Checksums-Sha1:
 72ea76c91750efcacd44c3ee9869918153f64126 1907 binutils-mingw-w64_11.6.dsc
 220a1083dc24b673ff2971a125bbaa38a5c7dd9e 9812 binutils-mingw-w64_11.6.tar.xz
 b1fc683d2f86f6e6ac34fc4a097ad9de8791609c 7686 
binutils-mingw-w64_11.6_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 aff558b45eb8639269eeab6c29b83b7ab924a48a86248574fe967cb96df2b58e 1907 
binutils-mingw-w64_11.6.dsc
 57778684b8313305014f8c2b2f887a8b93a136208809468116619a0e4f33570f 9812 
binutils-mingw-w64_11.6.tar.xz
 b52746c513dab3d73d3f1bae2a62e3af50079d1918cf888f24066491a0fe2c07 7686 
binutils-mingw-w64_11.6_source.buildinfo
Files:
 3d2a59487874820015da3a2fc341ff7b 1907 devel optional 
binutils-mingw-w64_11.6.dsc
 668f4268209af5bee903bb67b8688f10 9812 devel optional 
binutils-mingw-w64_11.6.tar.xz
 d00ce10bb397437d4d80f37602d52a1e 7686 devel optional 
binutils-mingw-w64_11.6_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=RGk9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpjnSchr1kUR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to