Um 21:32 Uhr am 12.09.06 schrieb Craig Small: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:13:48PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>> That's not correct. Although /usr/bin/which exists, it's a symlink to >> /bin/which, which _is_ available when /etc/init.d/procps is run > As is mine: > ls -l /usr/bin/which > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2006-07-24 16:42 /usr/bin/which -> /bin/which > > It appears in debianutils, mine is 2.16.2 > > We really need some more information about why this fails. It was really my fault, a combination of a procps backport to Sarge (where which is in /usr/bin) and a to quick and wrong investigation fonr by me. So to make this clear: There is _NO_ bug in the Sid procps package, just in the backported one, which needs a different init-script which does not rely on "which", because in Sarge "which" is not available at the time the init script is run. I already closed the bug as soon as I realized my error. Sorry for the noise and trouble. S° -- Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix-Geek Meine Gedanken im Netz: http://www.svenhartge.de/
