Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:06:13 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387848: tun-source: tun - Obsolete as Etch will be Linux 
2.6 only 
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: tun-source
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

| The stock 2.4.x Linux kernel series already include support for TUN/TAP
| devices, and this package provides the same functionality for 2.2.x kernels.
| FreeBSD kernels are also supported.
 
Etch will ship Linux 2.6 only.

Cheers,
        Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:49:39 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff writes:
>Package: tun-source
>Severity: grave
>Justification: renders package unusable
>
>| The stock 2.4.x Linux kernel series already include support for TUN/TAP
>| devices, and this package provides the same functionality for 2.2.x kernels.
>| FreeBSD kernels are also supported.
> 
>Etch will ship Linux 2.6 only.

that's not correct, see #354203. etch will *default* to 2.6, ship 2.4 
and some unlucky archs might even still need 2.2.

furthermore, this is not a bug of the package but should be reported
against ftp.d.o.

regards
az


-- 
+ Alexander Zangerl + DSA 42BD645D + (RSA 5B586291)
Penguin Trivia #46: Animals who are not penguins can only wish they were.
  -- Chicago Reader 10/15/82

Attachment: pgpnmeBc4m6Ku.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to