Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:10:05 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line form: FTBFS on armhf
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091275,
regarding form: FTBFS on armhf: compcomm.c:125:33: error: initialization of 
‘int *’ from incompatible pointer type ‘WORD *’ {aka ‘short int *’} 
[-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1091275: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091275
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: form
Version: 4.3.1+git20240409+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: [email protected]
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.

This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so this is a regression.
Also, there are no known issues on amd64 or arm64 according to recent (a couple
days ago) rebuilds.

The rebuild was done using an armhf chroot on an AWS "m6g" instance (Graviton2
CPU).

Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..   -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 
> -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -Wextra 
> -Wno-misleading-indentation -Wno-stringop-overflow -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
> -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
> -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c -o 
> form-compcomm.o `test -f 'compcomm.c' || echo './'`compcomm.c
> compcomm.c:125:33: error: initialization of ‘int *’ from incompatible pointer 
> type ‘WORD *’ {aka ‘short int *’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>   125 |         ,{"fewerstats",         &(AC.ShortStatsMax),    10,           
>   0}
>       |                                 ^
> compcomm.c:125:33: note: (near initialization for ‘onoffoptions[24].var’)
> compcomm.c:126:29: error: initialization of ‘int *’ from incompatible pointer 
> type ‘WORD *’ {aka ‘short int *’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>   126 |         ,{"fewerstatistics",&(AC.ShortStatsMax),        10,           
>   0}
>       |                             ^
> compcomm.c:126:29: note: (near initialization for ‘onoffoptions[25].var’)
> compcomm.c:131:29: error: initialization of ‘int *’ from incompatible pointer 
> type ‘WORD *’ {aka ‘short int *’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>   131 |         ,{"indentspace",    &(AO.IndentSpace),INDENTSPACE,0}
>       |                             ^
> compcomm.c:131:29: note: (near initialization for ‘onoffoptions[30].var’)
> compcomm.c:137:29: error: initialization of ‘int *’ from incompatible pointer 
> type ‘WORD *’ {aka ‘short int *’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>   137 |         ,{"innertest",      &(AC.InnerTest),  1,  0}
>       |                             ^
> compcomm.c:137:29: note: (near initialization for ‘onoffoptions[36].var’)
> make[4]: *** [Makefile:1399: form-compcomm.o] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/12/23/form_4.3.1+git20240409+ds-2_unstable-armhf.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20241223;[email protected]
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20241223&[email protected]&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
latest version skips building architectures of 32-bit

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to