On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 04:33:36PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>...
> Am 30.03.25 um 16:27 schrieb Jeremy Bícha:
> > Why is this issue serious?
>
> While looking at this, I noticed that wsdd-server (the package taking over
> the file from wsdd) doesn't have a Breaks/Replaces.
> I suppose this can lead to upgrade failures but I haven't actually tested
> that.
Depends: wsdd (= ${binary:Version}) seems to handle most cases,
including moving the conffile from wsdd to wsdd-server.
A bigger issue might be silently losing wsdd.service on upgrade to trixie,
there should be at least a recommends from wsdd to wsdd-server,[1]
which might or might not break the above.
> Regards,
> Michael
cu
Adrian
[1] Ideally depends, but then you have a circular dependency.
