Hi, On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:40:46AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > 2006/9/12, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >So are you saying you are not going to address this issue, or just that > >this aspect is irrelevant? > > I'm fixing it, jus pointing it doesn't brake sarge upgrades. > Before I throw it at NEW, just confirming: > > renaming the lib package to libwbxml2-0 is the correct way?
Well, I am not sure. I suggest you talk to upstream about it. The proper fix (in my opinion) would be for upstream to acknowledge they broke API, and release a new version with a libwbxml2.so.1.* instead of libwbxml2.so.0.*. Then the package would be called libwbxml2-1. However, I guess renaming the package to libwbxml2-0 would work for Debian's purposes as well, but maybe you should get a third opinion from somebody on that. cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
