--- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ["public use"]
> Your reading of this clause is not the plain English reading of it. > "public use" does not mean "use in public", in means "use by the > public" -- i.e., "use by anyone". I don't know if it is clear enough, at least for a non-native English speaker (me). Bug 321178 also suggests it should be worded better. > If this was the only problematic clause, I agree there's no > problem here. I assumed, based on the bug report you submitted, > that there was an issue with the license not permitting > /modification and distribution/, rather than use. Well, I submitted it as "serious", and justified by Policy 2.3, because the copyright file stated itself as a "work in progress", and 3270 was removed before because of licensing issues (although some of them not relevant anymore). But, if there's no problem, sorry for the noise. Thanks, Wagner _______________________________________________________ VocĂȘ quer respostas para suas perguntas? Ou vocĂȘ sabe muito e quer compartilhar seu conhecimento? Experimente o Yahoo! Respostas ! http://br.answers.yahoo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]