On 2025-06-07 10:38:12 [+0200], Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Jonathan,
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > >> Even after the fix from https://bugs.debian.org/1102106, git ftbfs on > >> s390x. Filing as a separate bug because this is a different failure. > > > > The patch you took was the top-most in the fix series, you also need the > > few that were applied before that one. That last one depends on the > > previous changes. I took me a while to figure that out. > > > > I collected them and verified that the package builds on amd64 and > > s390x. > > Interesting! Part of what is surprising to me is that the test > failure is different (mailsplit instead of min-batch-size) - I'm also > not seeing where in the proposed patches would affect this > functionality, as opposed to improving the code style (though > improving the code style is also of course nice :)). Do you have a > link to the log from when you built on s390x? Was it running tests? I rebuilt the whole package so all tests were running https://breakpoint.cc/log-uns-patched.txt > The other thing that surprised me was that experimental, which > includes all patches in "next", also continued to fail tests on 64-bit > big endian architectures, though now that I check again in the > experimental buildd logs that is yet another, different failure! > From [1]: This is https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected] Sebastian
