Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390019: fixed in gtalk 0.99.10-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtalk
Version: 0.99.10-10.1
Severity: serious

Hello Christoph,

There is an error when attempting to purge gtalk:
  Removing gtalk ...
  Purging configuration files for gtalk ...
  /var/lib/dpkg/info/gtalk.postrm: line 22: update-inetd: command not found
  dpkg: error processing gtalk (--purge):
   subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   gtalk

The postrm script cannot rely on update-inetd to be available when purging.

See Policy 7.2:
  Note, however, that the `postrm' cannot rely on any non-essential packages to
  be present during the `purge' phase.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gtalk
Source-Version: 0.99.10-11

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gtalk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

etalk_0.99.10-11_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtalk/etalk_0.99.10-11_all.deb
gtalk_0.99.10-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gtalk/gtalk_0.99.10-11.diff.gz
gtalk_0.99.10-11.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gtalk/gtalk_0.99.10-11.dsc
gtalk_0.99.10-11_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtalk/gtalk_0.99.10-11_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gtalk package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:14:51 +0200
Source: gtalk
Binary: gtalk etalk
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.99.10-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 etalk      - talk client for the Emacs editor
 gtalk      - plug-in replacement for standard talk
Closes: 346721 390019
Changes: 
 gtalk (0.99.10-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * check for existens of update-inetd before calling it in postinst and
     postrm (closes: #390019)
   * include Build-Depends fix from NMU (closes: #346721)
Files: 
 b13a05090cd76d5ccbe5df9b81237550 962 net optional gtalk_0.99.10-11.dsc
 280faa065d11a0424e2ecf132b7ed5bd 11481 net optional gtalk_0.99.10-11.diff.gz
 85e8f81edafe0bfd7ed821cc9339c385 174440 editors optional 
etalk_0.99.10-11_all.deb
 f088fe38477b38606271f2aa43be99f4 141464 net optional gtalk_0.99.10-11_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBRRzORG4/9k35XC9tAQJL7ggAjSouTGoPwAFdvghSmIwuTbhQ6zAQn8OR
zmzyE5CfmB7IrUqyl5LGeOATYIQb5LeXN8z653wmp7MhpfGcppGXDaxFnu43oUXD
6X4vTvszf/v7ZhPMc1r9zaWYxNgsnS0G8TzoRnyl1//sZeYMVAg/yNMwkvAQ6V6v
UM3fgeydVra+xH69abNnYbrsT8YkQKgdcHBCJVMXBgf63EpVp9Qfq8uWdREnON7d
Q75kBYJvipz+tqLqgVcgJsn7ZQRWMy9xpJgW+1IPx54g9OG/HdHpjd2vhfTwmSMH
vzAZMr9hRl4poYfbdkME4LhbHdP+VLX2DbgYRUhB2kWwugJjFiqMeQ==
=50Bv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to