On Thu, 16 Oct 2025 at 08:10, Andrew Bower <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 04:24:56PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > As already mentioned in the original bug report, if your package is > > not intended to work as a systemd service or under systemd at all, > > please feel free to downgrade or close+wontifx or anything else as you > > see fit. The severity raising is not intended to make anyone support > > scenarios they don't wish to support, but simply to ensure attention > > is given to the issue, even if just to close+wontfix. > > It looks like this package ships a user unit and the disabled-by-default > initscript is a fallback global service so I think the maintainer could > close this. > > > Also the bugs > > were opened based on Lintian reports, and it is possible that there > > might be false positives. > > Luca, this package already has a lintian override - does your script not > pick up on that? > > Thanks, hope this helps!
Sorry, I did not rerun any script, these bugs were opened a long long time ago, I simply followed up on the ones that are still open. There are too many to manually check one by one if they are still relevant, so if something changed in the meanwhile by all means, please close it/them. Thanks.
