Your message dated Fri, 27 Feb 2026 09:21:55 -0600
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Unable to reproduce
has caused the Debian Bug report #1110788,
regarding ruby-distribution: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed:
[31mFailure/Error: expect(@engine.p_value(pr, a, b)).to be_within(1e-09).of(x
/ 100.0)[0m
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1110788: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1110788
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-distribution
Version: 0.8.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: forky sid ftbfs
User: [email protected]
Usertags: ftbfs-20250809 ftbfs-forky
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2025/08/09/ruby-distribution_0.8.0+dfsg-1_unstable.log
All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20250809;[email protected]
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20250809&[email protected]&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--
Relevant part of the build log (hopefully):
> [31mFailure/Error: expect(@engine.p_value(pr, a, b)).to
> be_within(1e-09).of(x / 100.0)[0m
> [31m expected 0.9800000190734863 to be within 1.0e-09 of 0.98[0m
> [31m[37mShared Example Group: "Beta engine" called from
> /build/reproducible-path/ruby-distribution-0.8.0+dfsg/spec/beta_spec.rb:62[0m[0m
> [36m#
> /build/reproducible-path/ruby-distribution-0.8.0+dfsg/spec/beta_spec.rb:43:in
> `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'[0m
> [36m#
> /build/reproducible-path/ruby-distribution-0.8.0+dfsg/spec/beta_spec.rb:39:in
> `upto'[0m
> [36m#
> /build/reproducible-path/ruby-distribution-0.8.0+dfsg/spec/beta_spec.rb:39:in
> `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'[0m
>
> Finished in 1.13 seconds (files took 0.20629 seconds to load)
> [31m134 examples, 1 failure, 43 pending[0m
>
> Failed examples:
>
> [31mrspec
> '/build/reproducible-path/ruby-distribution-0.8.0+dfsg/spec/beta_spec.rb[1:2:1:3]'[0m
> [36m# Distribution::Beta Distribution::Beta::Ruby_ it should behave like
> Beta engine should return correct p_value[0m
>
> /usr/bin/ruby3.3
> -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.13.1/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.13.0/lib
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.13.0/exe/rspec
> --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb --format documentation failed
> ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed:
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
I am unable to reproduce this bug with a local build, and with 0.8.0+dfsg-2
that I just uploaded.
Please feel free to re-open with a new log if you can still reproduce.
Thanks,
Simon Quigley
[email protected]
--- End Message ---
