Your message dated Fri, 22 May 2026 23:07:17 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1136841: fixed in gnome-snapshot 50.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1136841,
regarding gnome-snapshot: FTBFS: error[E0277]: can't compare `auto::path::Path` 
with `auto::path::Path`
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1136841: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1136841
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:gnome-snapshot
Version: 49.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs forky sid

Dear maintainer:

During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build.

Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most
relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log
is available here:

https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202605/

About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS,
using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages.

If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I
am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is
fully reproducible.

If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use
reassign and add an affects on src:gnome-snapshot, so that this is still
visible in the BTS web page for this package.

Thanks.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
error[E0277]: can't compare `auto::path::Path` with `auto::path::Path`
  --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/gsk4-0.10.3/src/auto/path.rs:9:21
   |
 9 |     #[derive(Debug, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash)]
   |                     ^^^^^^^^^^ no implementation for `auto::path::Path == 
auto::path::Path`
   |
   = help: the trait `PartialEq` is not implemented for `auto::path::Path`
note: required by a bound in `PartialOrd`
  --> /usr/src/rustc-1.94.1/library/core/src/cmp.rs:1358:0
help: consider annotating `auto::path::Path` with `#[derive(PartialEq)]`
  --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/glib-0.21.5/src/shared.rs:35:1
   |
35 +         #[derive(PartialEq)]
36 |         $visibility struct $name $(<$($generic $(: $bound $(+ 
$bound2)*)?),+>)? {
   |

error[E0277]: the trait bound `auto::path::Path: std::cmp::Eq` is not satisfied
  --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/gsk4-0.10.3/src/auto/path.rs:9:33
   |
 9 |     #[derive(Debug, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash)]
   |                                 ^^^ the trait `std::cmp::Eq` is not 
implemented for `auto::path::Path`
   |
note: required by a bound in `Ord`
  --> /usr/src/rustc-1.94.1/library/core/src/cmp.rs:973:0
help: consider annotating `auto::path::Path` with `#[derive(Eq)]`
  --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/glib-0.21.5/src/shared.rs:35:1
   |
35 +         #[derive(Eq)]
36 |         $visibility struct $name $(<$($generic $(: $bound $(+ 
$bound2)*)?),+>)? {
   |

     Running `CARGO=/usr/bin/cargo CARGO_CRATE_NAME=field_of 
[too-long-redacted] it --cfg fieldoffset_has_alloc`
warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fieldoffset_assert_in_const_fn`
 --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/field-offset-0.3.6/src/lib.rs:2:13
  |
2 | #![cfg_attr(fieldoffset_assert_in_const_fn, feature(const_panic))]
  |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  |
  = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more
  = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
  = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for 
the lint:
           [lints.rust]
           unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = 
['cfg(fieldoffset_assert_in_const_fn)'] }
  = help: or consider adding 
`println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fieldoffset_assert_in_const_fn)");` to 
the top of the `build.rs`
  = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration
  = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fieldoffset_has_alloc`
 --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/field-offset-0.3.6/src/lib.rs:8:17
  |
8 | #[cfg(all(test, fieldoffset_has_alloc))]
  |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  |
  = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
  = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for 
the lint:
           [lints.rust]
           unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = 
['cfg(fieldoffset_has_alloc)'] }
  = help: or consider adding 
`println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fieldoffset_has_alloc)");` to the top of 
the `build.rs`
  = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fieldoffset_maybe_uninit`
  --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/field-offset-0.3.6/src/lib.rs:73:11
   |
73 |     #[cfg(fieldoffset_maybe_uninit)]
   |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
   = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for 
the lint:
            [lints.rust]
            unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = 
['cfg(fieldoffset_maybe_uninit)'] }
   = help: or consider adding 
`println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fieldoffset_maybe_uninit)");` to the top 
of the `build.rs`
   = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fieldoffset_maybe_uninit`
  --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/field-offset-0.3.6/src/lib.rs:81:15
   |
81 |     #[cfg(not(fieldoffset_maybe_uninit))]
   |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
   = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for 
the lint:
            [lints.rust]
            unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = 
['cfg(fieldoffset_maybe_uninit)'] }
   = help: or consider adding 
`println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fieldoffset_maybe_uninit)");` to the top 
of the `build.rs`
   = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fieldoffset_assert_in_const_fn`
   --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/field-offset-0.3.6/src/lib.rs:124:15
    |
124 |         #[cfg(fieldoffset_assert_in_const_fn)]
    |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for 
the lint:
             [lints.rust]
             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = 
['cfg(fieldoffset_assert_in_const_fn)'] }
    = help: or consider adding 
`println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fieldoffset_assert_in_const_fn)");` to 
the top of the `build.rs`
    = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: field `0` is never read
  --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/field-offset-0.3.6/src/lib.rs:60:25
   |
60 | struct PhantomContra<T>(fn(T));
   |        -------------    ^^^^^
   |        |
   |        field in this struct
   |
   = help: consider removing this field
   = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` (part of `#[warn(unused)]`) on by default

warning: `field-offset` (lib) generated 6 warnings
     Running `CARGO=/usr/bin/cargo CARGO_CRATE_NAME=ahash CA 
[too-long-redacted] eck-cfg 'cfg(folded_multiply)'`
warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `nightly-arm-aes`
   --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/ahash-0.8.12/src/lib.rs:101:13
    |
101 | #![cfg_attr(feature = "nightly-arm-aes", 
feature(stdarch_arm_neon_intrinsics))]
    |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `atomic-polyfill`, 
`compile-time-rng`, `const-random`, `default`, `getrandom`, `no-rng`, 
`runtime-rng`, `serde`, and `std`
    = help: consider adding `nightly-arm-aes` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`
    = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration
    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `nightly-arm-aes`
   --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/ahash-0.8.12/src/lib.rs:111:17
    |
111 |             all(feature = "nightly-arm-aes", target_arch = "aarch64", 
target_feature = "aes", not(miri)),
    |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `atomic-polyfill`, 
`compile-time-rng`, `const-random`, `default`, `getrandom`, `no-rng`, 
`runtime-rng`, `serde`, and `std`
    = help: consider adding `nightly-arm-aes` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`
    = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `nightly-arm-aes`
   --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/ahash-0.8.12/src/lib.rs:112:17
    |
112 |             all(feature = "nightly-arm-aes", target_arch = "arm", 
target_feature = "aes", not(miri)),
    |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `atomic-polyfill`, 
`compile-time-rng`, `const-random`, `default`, `getrandom`, `no-rng`, 
`runtime-rng`, `serde`, and `std`
    = help: consider adding `nightly-arm-aes` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`
    = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `128`
   --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/ahash-0.8.12/src/fallback_hash.rs:164:11
    |
164 |     #[cfg(target_pointer_width = "128")]
    |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: expected values for `target_pointer_width` are: `16`, `32`, and `64`
    = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `nightly-arm-aes`
   --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/ahash-0.8.12/src/operations.rs:115:9
    |
115 |     all(feature = "nightly-arm-aes", target_arch = "aarch64", 
target_feature = "aes", not(miri)),
    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `atomic-polyfill`, 
`compile-time-rng`, `const-random`, `default`, `getrandom`, `no-rng`, 
`runtime-rng`, `serde`, and `std`
    = help: consider adding `nightly-arm-aes` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`
    = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `nightly-arm-aes`
   --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/ahash-0.8.12/src/operations.rs:116:9
    |
116 |     all(feature = "nightly-arm-aes", target_arch = "arm", target_feature 
= "aes", not(miri)),
    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `atomic-polyfill`, 
`compile-time-rng`, `const-random`, `default`, `getrandom`, `no-rng`, 
`runtime-rng`, `serde`, and `std`
    = help: consider adding `nightly-arm-aes` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`
    = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `nightly-arm-aes`
   --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/ahash-0.8.12/src/operations.rs:145:9
    |
145 |     all(feature = "nightly-arm-aes", target_arch = "aarch64", 
target_feature = "aes", not(miri)),
    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `atomic-polyfill`, 
`compile-time-rng`, `const-random`, `default`, `getrandom`, `no-rng`, 
`runtime-rng`, `serde`, and `std`
    = help: consider adding `nightly-arm-aes` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`
    = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `nightly-arm-aes`
   --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/ahash-0.8.12/src/operations.rs:146:9
    |
146 |     all(feature = "nightly-arm-aes", target_arch = "arm", target_feature 
= "aes", not(miri)),
    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `atomic-polyfill`, 
`compile-time-rng`, `const-random`, `default`, `getrandom`, `no-rng`, 
`runtime-rng`, `serde`, and `std`
    = help: consider adding `nightly-arm-aes` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`
    = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `nightly-arm-aes`
 --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/ahash-0.8.12/src/random_state.rs:5:13
  |
5 |         all(feature = "nightly-arm-aes", target_arch = "aarch64", 
target_feature = "aes", not(miri)),
  |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  |
  = note: expected values for `feature` are: `atomic-polyfill`, 
`compile-time-rng`, `const-random`, `default`, `getrandom`, `no-rng`, 
`runtime-rng`, `serde`, and `std`
  = help: consider adding `nightly-arm-aes` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`
  = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `nightly-arm-aes`
 --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/ahash-0.8.12/src/random_state.rs:6:13
  |
6 |         all(feature = "nightly-arm-aes", target_arch = "arm", 
target_feature = "aes", not(miri)),
  |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  |
  = note: expected values for `feature` are: `atomic-polyfill`, 
`compile-time-rng`, `const-random`, `default`, `getrandom`, `no-rng`, 
`runtime-rng`, `serde`, and `std`
  = help: consider adding `nightly-arm-aes` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`
  = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
  --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/ahash-0.8.12/src/random_state.rs:48:58
   |
48 |     if #[cfg(all(feature = "compile-time-rng", any(test, fuzzing)))] {
   |                                                          ^^^^^^^
   |
   = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, `folded_multiply`, 
`specialize`, and `test` and 31 more
   = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
   = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for 
the lint:
            [lints.rust]
            unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
   = help: or consider adding 
`println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
   = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
  --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/ahash-0.8.12/src/random_state.rs:68:54
   |
68 |     } else if #[cfg(all(feature = "runtime-rng", not(fuzzing)))] {
   |                                                      ^^^^^^^
   |
   = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
   = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for 
the lint:
            [lints.rust]
            unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
   = help: or consider adding 
`println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
   = note: see 
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for 
more information about checking conditional configuration

warning: methods `read_u128x2`, `read_u128x4`, `read_last_u16`, 
`read_last_u128x2`, and `read_last_u128x4` are never used
  --> /usr/share/cargo/registry/ahash-0.8.12/src/convert.rs:68:8
   |
63 | pub(crate) trait ReadFromSlice {
   |                  ------------- methods in this trait
...
68 |     fn read_u128x2(&self) -> ([u128; 2], &[u8]);
   |        ^^^^^^^^^^^
69 |     fn read_u128x4(&self) -> ([u128; 4], &[u8]);
   |        ^^^^^^^^^^^
70 |     fn read_last_u16(&self) -> u16;
   |        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...
74 |     fn read_last_u128x2(&self) -> [u128; 2];
   |        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
75 |     fn read_last_u128x4(&self) -> [u128; 4];
   |        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` (part of `#[warn(unused)]`) on by default

warning: `ahash` (lib) generated 13 warnings
   Compiling zbus_macros v5.13.2
     Running `CARGO=/usr/bin/cargo CARGO_CRATE_NAME=zbus_mac 
[too-long-redacted] rn proc_macro --cap-lints warn`
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
warning: `gsk4` (lib) generated 23 warnings
error: could not compile `gsk4` (lib) due to 2 previous errors; 23 warnings 
emitted

Caused by:
  process didn't exit successfully: `CARGO=/usr/bin/cargo CA 
[too-long-redacted] argo/registry` (exit status: 1)
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
[58/59] /usr/bin/msgfmt -o po/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/snapshot.mo ../po/zh_TW.po
FAILED: [code=101] src/snapshot 
/usr/bin/env /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo build --manifest-path 
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/Cargo.toml --target-dir 
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src --release --features x11 && cp 
src/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/snapshot src/snapshot
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
dh_auto_build: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 ninja -j2 -v 
returned exit code 101
make: *** [debian/rules:15: binary] Error 25
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess failed with exit 
status 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnome-snapshot
Source-Version: 50.0-1
Done: Matthias Geiger <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnome-snapshot, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthias Geiger <[email protected]> (supplier of updated gnome-snapshot 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 00:35:00 +0200
Source: gnome-snapshot
Architecture: source
Version: 50.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers 
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Matthias Geiger <[email protected]>
Closes: 1136841
Changes:
 gnome-snapshot (50.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release (Closes: #1136841)
   * Rebase patches for new upstream release
   * d/control: Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.4; no changes needed
   * d/rules: Adjust built-using path for new upstream
Checksums-Sha1:
 b77c4066b3dfb4da1b9f539eba1d5e0ab892c841 2594 gnome-snapshot_50.0-1.dsc
 0a12af7de09ff963a7afddf74e30f3718c496e04 1137884 
gnome-snapshot_50.0.orig.tar.bz2
 a278cc6d846540fa54323ab938a806f7e569ddf3 7416 
gnome-snapshot_50.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 3b692251f84b500377fcc344e9ea35fd3aeb4414 52980 
gnome-snapshot_50.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 9357667c93e55c4c974cdfb331b37a339d17e33c83b0bef585050c0dccfdbcc4 2594 
gnome-snapshot_50.0-1.dsc
 323bb12f091967124db0a2e6922c33df64630df2c5e8cc402b591782f06d50c4 1137884 
gnome-snapshot_50.0.orig.tar.bz2
 9b413d38f111634986ff6f21d7d79dc871bfbb5608b0feaa6ad7695506b49b01 7416 
gnome-snapshot_50.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 a46da3f20fe27636359f827e5595e2e6e0c1127a9c3fdffe74a7e559aaaea909 52980 
gnome-snapshot_50.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 09295cce4b82027ca8eda76af8ab606c 2594 gnome optional gnome-snapshot_50.0-1.dsc
 e6afba1b8a84b695b90a030418219811 1137884 gnome optional 
gnome-snapshot_50.0.orig.tar.bz2
 de01ff9abcc78d541ddb3697fdd7d210 7416 gnome optional 
gnome-snapshot_50.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 fa92cb0e211d9437d82d99fc677682aa 52980 gnome optional 
gnome-snapshot_50.0-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQUWTv/Sl6/b+DpcW7svtu2B7myvgUCahDeFgAKCRDsvtu2B7my
vn0WAP4vENyEE+wvFhrCLQmNWO4QWiUBimR5OFo59gWw2+IZ4QD/XaxwyJB8SLw5
0X+Z8i+WjWjvyFgkzTxJx2Iu08n2dA0=
=B3G1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpLlPq3_928O.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to