Your message dated Tue, 26 May 2026 12:19:16 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1136833: fixed in bustle 0.13.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1136833,
regarding bustle: FTBFS: error[E0277]: can't compare `auto::path::Path` with
`auto::path::Path`
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1136833: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1136833
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:bustle
Version: 0.13.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs forky sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build.
Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most
relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log
is available here:
https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202605/
About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS,
using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages.
If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I
am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is
fully reproducible.
If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use
reassign and add an affects on src:bustle, so that this is still
visible in the BTS web page for this package.
Thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `v4_22`
--> /usr/share/cargo/registry/gsk4-0.10.3/src/auto/enums.rs:1469:19
|
1469 | #[cfg(feature = "v4_22")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^-------
| |
| help: there is a expected value with a
similar name: `"v4_20"`
|
= note: expected values for `feature` are: `broadway`, `v4_10`, `v4_14`,
`v4_16`, `v4_18`, `v4_2`, `v4_20`, `v4_4`, `v4_6`, and `vulkan`
= help: consider adding `v4_22` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`
= note: see
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for
more information about checking conditional configuration
warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `v4_22`
--> /usr/share/cargo/registry/gsk4-0.10.3/src/auto/enums.rs:1471:19
|
1471 | #[cfg(feature = "v4_22")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^-------
| |
| help: there is a expected value with a
similar name: `"v4_20"`
|
= note: expected values for `feature` are: `broadway`, `v4_10`, `v4_14`,
`v4_16`, `v4_18`, `v4_2`, `v4_20`, `v4_4`, `v4_6`, and `vulkan`
= help: consider adding `v4_22` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`
= note: see
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for
more information about checking conditional configuration
error[E0277]: can't compare `auto::path::Path` with `auto::path::Path`
--> /usr/share/cargo/registry/gsk4-0.10.3/src/auto/path.rs:9:21
|
9 | #[derive(Debug, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^ no implementation for `auto::path::Path ==
auto::path::Path`
|
= help: the trait `PartialEq` is not implemented for `auto::path::Path`
note: required by a bound in `PartialOrd`
--> /usr/src/rustc-1.94.1/library/core/src/cmp.rs:1358:0
help: consider annotating `auto::path::Path` with `#[derive(PartialEq)]`
--> /usr/share/cargo/registry/glib-0.21.5/src/shared.rs:35:1
|
35 + #[derive(PartialEq)]
36 | $visibility struct $name $(<$($generic $(: $bound $(+
$bound2)*)?),+>)? {
|
error[E0277]: the trait bound `auto::path::Path: std::cmp::Eq` is not satisfied
--> /usr/share/cargo/registry/gsk4-0.10.3/src/auto/path.rs:9:33
|
9 | #[derive(Debug, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash)]
| ^^^ the trait `std::cmp::Eq` is not
implemented for `auto::path::Path`
|
note: required by a bound in `Ord`
--> /usr/src/rustc-1.94.1/library/core/src/cmp.rs:973:0
help: consider annotating `auto::path::Path` with `#[derive(Eq)]`
--> /usr/share/cargo/registry/glib-0.21.5/src/shared.rs:35:1
|
35 + #[derive(Eq)]
36 | $visibility struct $name $(<$($generic $(: $bound $(+
$bound2)*)?),+>)? {
|
Running `CARGO=/usr/bin/cargo CARGO_CRATE_NAME=zvariant
[too-long-redacted] stry=/usr/share/cargo/registry`
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
warning: `gsk4` (lib) generated 23 warnings
error: could not compile `gsk4` (lib) due to 2 previous errors; 23 warnings
emitted
Caused by:
process didn't exit successfully: `CARGO=/usr/bin/cargo CA
[too-long-redacted] argo/registry` (exit status: 1)
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
[21/22] /usr/bin/msgfmt -o po/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/bustle.mo ../po/zh_CN.po
FAILED: [code=101] src/bustle
/usr/bin/env /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo build --manifest-path
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/Cargo.toml --target-dir
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src --release && cp
src/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/bustle src/bustle
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
dh_auto_build: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 ninja -j2 -v
returned exit code 101
make: *** [debian/rules:15: binary] Error 25
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess failed with exit
status 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: bustle
Source-Version: 0.13.0-4
Done: Matthias Geiger <[email protected]>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bustle, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthias Geiger <[email protected]> (supplier of updated bustle package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 13:42:45 +0200
Source: bustle
Architecture: source
Version: 0.13.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Matthias Geiger <[email protected]>
Closes: 1136833
Changes:
bustle (0.13.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Build with gtk-rs 0.11 (Closes: #1136833)
* d/control: Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.4; no changes needed
Checksums-Sha1:
51adf34c8fb0aab9109f39c707421884f2234a9a 2967 bustle_0.13.0-4.dsc
2b081678858f9577b85daad8b86aad60596e825d 13636 bustle_0.13.0-4.debian.tar.xz
93e23e669427e3e7cd68226aee0ba2faf4877b6e 603212 bustle_0.13.0-4.git.tar.xz
d41d96afc5163ddf97e14bb7be60f6b8234af093 17422 bustle_0.13.0-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
25cde6e80d5867659bc7cd0d48b1cf469f857a4e8aafaea5ac68f229cca04a74 2967
bustle_0.13.0-4.dsc
c388ce4d01f4144f4bfc6a8aa3c84747afdcd77097afe0bd58569715874058d2 13636
bustle_0.13.0-4.debian.tar.xz
6a744c17ddf3f553a517aa8921884a58783e558092510d25a89350baac8f4586 603212
bustle_0.13.0-4.git.tar.xz
b3cb4c6b61feed1b0b1907ff2ed2c5c60b9faf27164f9ba9141ce4efb48cc4ee 17422
bustle_0.13.0-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
00dd8bbc9aa5494bfe3601dcd3c0140a 2967 devel optional bustle_0.13.0-4.dsc
326fb3a93220180b58451bbf78b99afe 13636 devel optional
bustle_0.13.0-4.debian.tar.xz
6b006b7c362f2bdc2971f977694d98d4 603212 devel None bustle_0.13.0-4.git.tar.xz
97990c1b038ddf9486a05b1939fe5d02 17422 devel optional
bustle_0.13.0-4_source.buildinfo
Git-Tag-Info: tag=99a54d546485dea117f8f66318931a45cb70e5e3
fp=14593bff4a5ebf6fe0e9716eecbedbb607b9b2be
Git-Tag-Tagger: Matthias Geiger <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=uTy1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgpDAwavdq07R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
