Control: severity -1 important Control: reassign -1 texlive-binaries
Am 30.05.2026 um 01:17 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: Hello Vincent,
Well, then: we need to introduce a Breaks statement into texlive-bin to make sure texlive-latex-base (that package contains the files in question) has been upgraded, when texlive-bin is upgraded. I don't see partial upgrades as normal use cases, hence I lower the severity to important.Note that "apt install -f" was still giving the same error. The packages of texlive-bin source were upgraded from 2025.20250727.75242+ds-5+b2 to 2026.20260303.78225+ds-4 but the packages of texlive-base and of texlive-extra sources were still at 2025.20260124-1. Upgrading the remaining to the 2026.* versions made the error disappear.
Thanks for the test + report anyway
If the mixed 2025 + 2026 packages cannot be handled, the situation should be disallowed via some Depends, Breaks, and/or Conflicts declaration in particular to ensure that dependency resolution cannot yield such a situation.
-- sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

