Quoting Timothy Gaskell (2026-08-13 03:25:10) > I think you misunderstood me. My point was NOT that the Google font or the > CTAN fbb package are examples of appropriate source inclusion. I know full > well that both of those organizations have their own admission standards. > Rather my point was that having only TTF and not VFB is not an actual > barrier to people wishing to edit the font the way having only binaries of > an application would be. People both can and *have* used the TTF to edit > this exact font multiple times.
Technically, anyone can decide for themselves what they treat as source format. Legally, the copyright holder of the former project may or may not have restrictions about availability of source for derived works of theirs, and if they do then *their* preferred form for source is what counts, not whatever form I or you prefer for source of our fork. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
