Hi Francesco, On 10/3/26 11:23, Francesco Ballarin wrote:
I am not fully sure why this has been filed against src:netgen. To me, it seems that there is nothing we can do from here.
I think I've made a mistake somewhere as I recall seeing an other error than the one I included in my bug report. That issue is indeed tracked in bug 1147135.
Indeed, I was thinking of the message I saw in [1]:290s autopkgtest [09:05:30]: test netgen-test-python: - - - - - - - - - - stderr - - - - - - - - - - 290s --------------------------------------------------------------------------
290s A deprecated MCA variable value was specified in the environment or 290s on the command line. Deprecated MCA variables should be avoided; 290s they may disappear in future releases. 290s 290s Deprecated variable: schizo_proxy 290s New variable: personality290s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 290s --------------------------------------------------------------------------
290s A deprecated MCA variable value was specified in the environment or 290s on the command line. Deprecated MCA variables should be avoided; 290s they may disappear in future releases. 290s 290s Deprecated variable: rmaps_default_mapping_policy 290s New variable: mapby290s --------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/n/netgen/testing/amd64/76309948/
Finally, I can't seem to remember how the "Issues preventing migration" part is being automatically generated by britney, but it looks very odd in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openmpi . For instance: dolfin, fenics-dolfinx and scifem are being tested with autopkgtest, but e.g. PETSc and mpi4py (which also rely on the MPI libraries, and which are runtime dependencies of each of the three packages mentioned above) are not being tested at all. This means if there was an issue in PETSc, it would only be discovered through e.g. dolfin, and one may not even realize at first glance that the issue is not in dolfin but in PETSc.
I didn't check the above, but we only test direct reverse (test) dependencies. Might that explain the situation? If they need to run when an indirect dependency gets updated, the autopkgtest spec [2] mentions the hint-testsuite-triggers restriction.
Paul[2] https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst?ref_type=heads
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

