On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 16:56 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:06:03AM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> > From a quick glance at the source code the version in sarge
> > (1.2.10-15sarge1.0.1) also appears to be vulnerable. It contains the
> > same code snippet that was modified from 1.292 to 1.294.
> > 
> > http://proftp.cvs.sourceforge.net/proftp/proftpd/src/main.c?r1=1.292&r2=1.294
> 
> A new security-stable version is already on-air since yesterday.

Thanks for the quick response.

-- 
-- arthur de jong - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - west consulting b.v. --


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to