El domingo, 3 de diciembre de 2006 15:13, Szakacsits Szabolcs escribió: > On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > > > Sorry I didn't explain myself better. My patch was only for Vista. > > > > Disagree. Your patch is fine for all NTFS volumes. There is no need to > > set the mounted on NT4 bit on any volume during what NTFS resize does. > > It does not do anything that would be analogous to an NT4 operation. I > > have no idea why you ever set the flag. As far as I am concerned setting > > that flag at all is an outright bug in NTFS resize. > > Ntfsresize works based on the volume version but unconditionally sets > VOLUME_MOUNTED_ON_NT4 to make chkdsk believe and fix potentially missed > V3.x modifications. > > I'm not aware of such problem but that doesn't mean there can't be any. > So you may or may not be right but me being over paranoid about reliability > I stick to the latter for now. Though an explicit and official guarantee > from Microsoft could change my standpoint.
I have some contacts at Microsoft. If you can summarize this problem
into a
question, I could have some answers. Not official, but some answers.
Best regards,
Ender.
--
Network engineer
Debian Developer
pgpPaqE5MSPNf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
