Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sam, 16 Dez 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: >> > 3) Retain aleph, and change the name of the binary in one package or the >> > other. If we don't do (2), and the release team is not happy with (1), >> > then this is obviously the right course. I don't care at all which >> > program's name is changed or what it's changed to. What are the pros >> > and cons? >> >> Sounds like this is the way to go. > > THis name change is currently under discussion in the tex-live > (upstream) mailing list with the original authors participating. As soon > as we have come to a conclusion there it will be executed in Debian.
Sorry, aren't the texlive people talking about mex? I always thought that it was settled that aleph "belongs" to the TeX community, and the programming language is "afnix"? Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)