On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:41 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > 1) The release team has asked us not to upload changes which are not > > destined for etch, and making gnucash work with the glib in unstable is > > therefore a low priority; > > The glib in unstable is destined for etch, whether you like it or not.
What part of the freeze policy do you not understand? You uploaded two new upstream versions which fix no Debian bugs *after* the freeze. One of them introduced a *regression*. > > > 2) I shouldn't need to spend energy asking you to please work on getting > > etch out, instead of making uploads that won't get in etch anyway; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@汿 ENOPARSE. Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
