On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:23:47AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > We should raise the severity of the bug to grave (better than serious, > > since it's a usability issue, not a policy violation) and upload a new > > 0.0.18 version with the minimal patch. I think the release team will be > > happy with that.
> Done. Sorry, what's the rationale of this bug being marked as 'grave'? Has this problem been seen on any archs other than amd64, where it fails the testsuite and therefore generates no binaries? If all the archs where the package has been built have working binaries, I don't see any reason why this should be treated as RC, despite amd64 being the missing arch. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
