-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael Biebl wrote: > I agree with Sjoerd. It's definitely not an RC bug.
Why? Lack of solution is not an argument for lowering severity. > If you want to control the starting of hal via policy-rc.d, you have to > do that indirectly via the dbus init script. How? On a system with policy-d responding errorcode 101 always, the hal daemon is started on package update. > We are basically bound by the limitations of our current init system. I agree. Which means this bug stays open, not that severity is low. > As hal depends on dbus, it has to be restarted/stopped when dbus is > restarted/stopped. That's why we came up with the solution we have now. > Having the hal start script installed as init script in /etc/init.d/ > would cause more problems than it would solve. I agree that the current approach is better for most cases, and I do not suggest to change to a simpler approach. But still, the current approach does not follow policy, and it does cause real harm for some. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFrfUTn7DbMsAkQLgRAlFVAJ9BjCLdS5DD3mNuW+6WNj73pogIHgCeMilb Xo/DrcX4TJASvgJ5I0Vq34Q= =CNDa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
