On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 03:59:18AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Could you please verify whether this problem still exists using
> linux-image-2.6.18-4-ixp4xx from unstable?  There were some known bugs in
> the previous linux-image packages which seemed to hit nslu systems
> especially hard.
> 

Hmm, had to change mirrors to get it. Sadly, no change:

LKG8A754B:~# uname -a
Linux LKG8A754B 2.6.18-4-ixp4xx #1 Wed Jan 24 15:26:25 UTC 2007 armv5tel 
GNU/Linux

....

 2088 ?        Ss     0:00 /usr/sbin/sfssd
 2089 ?        S      0:00  \_ /usr/bin/logger -p daemon.notice -t 
 2090 ?        S      0:00  \_ /usr/lib/sfs-0.8pre/sfsauthd
 2091 ?        R      0:00  \_ /usr/lib/sfs-0.8pre/sfsrwsd

LKG8A754B:~# sfskey register
Passphrase for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:  
sfskey: fatal: No changes made
localhost: LOGIN RPC: RPC: Unable to receive
LKG8A754B:~# ps axf

.....

 2088 ?        Ss     0:00 /usr/sbin/sfssd
 2089 ?        S      0:00  \_ /usr/bin/logger -p daemon.notice -t 
 2091 ?        S      0:00  \_ /usr/lib/sfs-0.8pre/sfsrwsd

... !!Its dead!! ...

LKG8A754B:~# tail /var/log/syslog
Jan 26 20:19:24 LKG8A754B : sfsrwsd: version 0.8pre, pid 2091
Jan 26 20:19:24 LKG8A754B : sfsauthd: version 0.8pre, pid 2090
Jan 26 20:19:25 LKG8A754B : sfsauthd: dbcache_refresh_delay = 0
Jan 26 20:19:25 LKG8A754B : sfsauthd: Disabling authentication server cache 
refresh...
Jan 26 20:19:25 LKG8A754B : sfsauthd: serving 
@nslu2.internal,pv5tbuysggfb3322r5wbs4v6mg9xzpk3
Jan 26 20:19:26 LKG8A754B mountd[1955]: authenticated mount request from 
localhost:995 for /etc/sfs/root (/etc/sfs/root)
Jan 26 20:19:27 LKG8A754B mountd[1955]: authenticated mount request from 
localhost:995 for /media (/media)
Jan 26 20:19:28 LKG8A754B : sfsrwsd: serving 
/sfs/@nslu2.internal,pv5tbuysggfb3322r5wbs4v6mg9xzpk3
Jan 26 20:19:51 LKG8A754B : sfsauthd: fatal: Should not be reached
Jan 26 20:19:51 LKG8A754B : sfssd: EOF from /usr/lib/sfs-0.8pre/sfsauthd

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to