On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 08:38:23PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Sunday 11 February 2007 18:21, Jurij Smakov wrote: > > I think that changing ABI without abiname bump is a more reasonable > > solution than dropping it completely. Impact would be pretty minor, > > given the number of people using sparc32.
> Note that this does mean that any packages containing kernel modules > will/may need rebuilding on sparc. In practice, this appears limited to loop-aes, d-i, and l-m-e-2.6. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
