On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:32:45AM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Il giorno lun, 26/02/2007 alle 00.54 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto: > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:44:37AM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > > Il giorno lun, 26/02/2007 alle 01.31 -0500, Jamie ffolliott ha scritto: > > > > I'm on i386. A binary package is ok. Thanks, I will have to try > > > > sometime > > > > tomorrow or in the evening.
> > > http://centrum.lixper.it/~giuseppe/libpam-ldap_183-0.0_i386.deb > > Is the diff available somewhere for comment? > http://centrum.lixper.it/~giuseppe/libpam-ldap_183-0.0.diff.gz > http://centrum.lixper.it/~giuseppe/libpam-ldap_183-0.0.dsc > http://centrum.lixper.it/~giuseppe/libpam-ldap_183.orig.tar.gz I find nothing in the debdiff between this and the current libpam-ldap package that addresses this bug. Could you please provide a stand-alone patch? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
