On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 11:02:30AM +0000, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 09:06:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 07:30:04PM +0000, Enrico Zini wrote: > > > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms714556.aspx > > > says that SQL_C_SLONG represents a long int. > > Microsoft's docs are totally useless for correctly implementing ODBC on > > 64-bit architectures. Please explain the /problem/ you're trying to solve, > > preferably with a reproducible use case. > Sorry. What's a good authoritative API reference then? Unfortunately, there isn't one. Microsoft is the standard-bearer for ODBC, they just don't know jack about 64-bit implementation issues. There have been some incremental improvements to the ODBC spec vis-à-vis 64-bit platforms, but getting things working on 64-bit archs as we have in Debian still requires some deviation from the 32-bit-minded spec. Anyway, with Steinar's follow-up, I guess this part is definitely Not-A-Bug, and I'll focus on the bits reported earlier. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
