On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:10:48PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Eddy Petri??or wrote: > > Just a tired and blind attempt at this bug. > > Could you patch the init script with the attached pacth and see if > > it works?
> --oknodo in stop is never acceptable, it is NOT OK if the daemon is there > and we don't stop it. Thanks for the effort, anyway. That's not what --oknodo means. Please see the manpage; --oknodo is exactly what's wanted here. The only part of this patch that doesn't make sense is passing an explicit --signal option, when it's the same as the default behavior. > In fact, that's how I'd fix this bug if I had the time right now. Does this mean you don't have time (even with a patch), and would like an NMU? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
