Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tags 393373 + pending > thanks > > Hi, > Looking at this bug, it looks like gtk-gnutella actually contains two > RFC: > >> gtk-gnutella-0.96.1svn11444/doc/other/rfc3548.txt >> MISMATCH rfc3548.txt > (which indeed is rfc3548) > >> gtk-gnutella-0.96.1svn11444/doc/gnutella/draft-nielsen-dime-02.txt >> MATCH draft-nielsen-dime-02.txt > > The first is actually made obsolete by rfc4648 by the same author (S. > Josefsson, CC:ed here) which contains the right copyright notice. > As Simon is currently directly involved in this mass-bug-reporting, I > think that this rfc is not the main problem: I will maintain it as is > for now, asking upstream to replace it with rfc4648 in the next upstream > release. Simon, as the copyright owner, are you ok with it?
I'm not the copyright owner of the entire document. Substantial parts of it was copied (with permission under the normal IETF license) from earlier RFC documents. We don't have permission to redistribute those pieces under a DFSG-compatible license. > The second one instead seems to be a real trouble, I will ask the > authors for a better license, but I'm pessimist and I think I will end > removing it from the tarball and asking upstream to do the same. Alas, I suspect that you'll have to remove both. :-( /Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
