Le Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 09:02:53PM -0700, Joey Hess écrivait:
> I need to make a debian cd that has some locally built packages on it.
> It If use $MIRROR/dists/$CODENAME/local/binary-$ARCH/<section> like the
> debian-cd docs tell me to, will the local packages be in the Packages
> files and installable by apt?
Yes it should. If it doesn't then it's a bug.
There's no need for an override file since dpkg-scanpackages is called
with /dev/null :
|if [ -n "$LOCAL" ]; then
| dpkg-scanpackages -m "`cat .disk/info`" \
| dists/$CODENAME/local/binary-$ARCH \
| /dev/null > $PREFIX.Packages-local
|fi
[ for other debian-cd readers and Steve in particular ]
BTW, I hope that the recent changes for the nonUS stuff didn't break the
local stuff...
(i'm saying that because we're using code like :
for i in $TDIR/$CODENAME-$ARCH/*.packages; do
dir=${i%%.packages}
n=${dir##$TDIR/$CODENAME-$ARCH/}
if [ $n -le $NUM ]; then
cat $dir.Packages-local \
>>dists/$CODENAME/local/binary-$ARCH/Packages.cd
cat $dir.Packages-local | gzip --best \
>>dists/$CODENAME/local/binary-$ARCH/Packages.cd.gz
fi
done
and I wonder what can happen when *.packages returns 1_NONUS.packages
too ... doesn't look like 1_NONUS -le 2 is a valid numerical comparison
... looks like we have a couple of times this problem, should we use
?.packages instead of *.packages everywhere ? Steve ?)
And should I upload to frozen the latest debian-cd before we start the
new test cycle ? I think so ... but I'd lie that we take a rapid look at
this bug and check if we don't have the very same problem somewhere else
...
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]