On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:23:48PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: >On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:12:11PM +0100, Jens Franik wrote: >> >Guten Tag Mattias Wadenstein, >> > >> >am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2008 um 10:29 schriebst Du: >> >But the only item, which has been downloaded until now is >> >the Update-i386-DVD with 1,26 Mb - nothing more. >> > >> >I guess nobody really needs them :-) >> >> Yup. Oldstable point releases are like that. There tends to be rather >> more interest in new major stable releases, as you might imagine. :-) > >How about just removing the directory for bittorent and any links to it for >oldstable? If we cannot seed the images and they unlikely to get seeded >much by others, should we really offer bittorent at all? > >Wouldn't it be better to just offer jigdo and the ISOs and be done with it?
Yup, I guess so. We should be able to handle the ISO/jigdo downloads directly from cdimage; bittorent is just adding overhead if there aren't a lot of users. Maswan - you may as well kill the bt stuff. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] "I've only once written 'SQL is my bitch' in a comment. But that code is in use on a military site..." -- Simon Booth -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
