On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 09:33:03PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: >From farbror (CD build server): > >--- tools/boot/squeeze/boot-x86 (revision 1964) >+++ tools/boot/squeeze/boot-x86 (working copy) >@@ -230,7 +230,8 @@ > boot$N/isolinux/win32-loader.ini boot$N/ > fi > >- if [ -e boot$N/isolinux/f3.txt.withgtk ]; then >+ >+ if [ 0 = 1 ] && -e boot$N/isolinux/f3.txt.withgtk ]; then > extra_image gtk/initrd.gz > mv boot$N/isolinux/f3.txt.withgtk boot$N/isolinux/f3.txt > mv boot$N/isolinux/f4.txt.withgtk boot$N/isolinux/f4.txt > >Wow, so now the build does not fail. >Is it really better to ignore errors and create broken images [1] than to >actually solve the error? That really sucks.
I saw that the graphical images weren't available any more so I disabled them. From the last discussion I saw fly past, it looks like the lack of graphical images is a known feature. I'm getting dozens of complaints every time the weekly builds fail these days, so with no further information to go on and no warning from the d-i folks I took this choice. It's getting painful using the daily-built d-i images for the weekly testing CDs, as the number of broken builds is very high. I would really *really* like to see d-i properly integrated into the archive and uploaded periodically so it can migrate to testing, as we've discussed in the past many times. The current situation is a train wreck. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "Since phone messaging became popular, the young generation has lost the ability to read or write anything that is longer than one hundred and sixty characters." -- Ignatios Souvatzis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org