Hi, Michael Gilbert <mgilb...@debian.org> writes: > The default has no bearing whatsoever on whether well-connected users > can or can't install one of the shiny desktops if they so choose.
The default has no bearing whatsoever on whether un-connected users can or can't install one of the more minimal desktops, if they so choose. I think, the aggression (on both parts) is pretty unsubstantiated. At least I take this from this sentence: > If the xfce iso didn't exist, people in these situtations would > not be able to install a usable Debian system. Looks to me like a misunderstanding, as nobody ever suggested, as far as I know, that installation medias for non-default desktops should be provided in the future. The questions just is, what should be the default. I at least see no conflict in choosing one of the "shiny desktops" for this with supporting less internet-supplied countries, as long as there are smaller installation medias for this use-case. Best, Axel Wagner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87sil7hrqs.fsf@rincewind.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me
