Philipp,
> > > Alternatively, we could make pigz a strict build requirement but
> > > that sounds a little antisocial.
> >
> > Right.
>
> In what way do you consider this antisocial and what's speaking against
> doing that?
I was using this word in a somewhat romantic sense; fewer
dependencies are "better" in some aesthetic or poetic sense.
Please do not read too much into it. :)
(I had also slightly assumed that pigz was only on some archs, but
I am clearly mistaken there...)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
