Hi >There is a Pico-clone named nano which is included in >Debian.. Pls care that Debian is a distro respect >license very much.
I didn't blame Debian about pico missing in the list and I understand why Debian missing them as well. ha shao's reply made me upset about pico (and its license) only. I am not blaming anyone. Don't be so serious... >Besides, I recommend you try others editor rather then pico... >like joe, vi, emacs >pico got too less function to be a serious editor. I just get the nano, it is nice, identical to pico but I am using vi now. BTW, Editors are always the beginning of flame war. :) vi rulez! (oh.. did I support pico !?... :P) Cheers WK Yeung
