Hideki Yamane <[email protected]> writes: > Hi,
Hi, > > On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 10:08:22 +0100 > Arnaud Patard (Rtp) <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Yes, let's add "5.Debian 6.0+" :-) >> >> no, wheezy+. I really doubt that there's enough stuff on kernel side to >> have things working on squeeze. > >>> >> 3.Suse (SLES) 11SP2+ > > SLES11 is shipped with Linux kernel 2.6.32, it's same as Squeeze. > So I thought Debian 6.0 is okay. But SLES11 "SP2" is 3.0.10. > Yes, probably you're right. It should be Wheezy+. > > Anyway, let's ask to upstream to add Debian :) > > I don't know the exact requirements to be listed here. Maybe asking in diff -Nup form will be enough ? :) >> Well, it's upstream README. The example can be extracted but I'm not >> sure it's usefull. In most cases, one should only install the agent and >> there's nothing else to do. > > Yes, its upstream one but proposal for upstream to improving is good > thing, IMO. And I said in previous mail, handling .conf file in post/pre > script is not good habit. > > >> This version of the agent has been taken from github before that any >> versionning scheme has been choosen by upstream (it's from 6th of june >> and 1.1 has been released on the 9th of november). I've made a 1.1-1 >> yesterday and will update it when the 1.2 is there. > > Okay. > I've put a deb for 1.2 with your previous comments addressed, except for the post/pre stuff (which have been changed a little bit but don't address the concerns you had). You'll find them here: http://contrib.hupstream.com/azure/debian/repo-unstable/ > >> In fact, I'm not even sure that the current changelog entries should be >> kept before uploading to the archive so it'll be 1.1-1 or 1.2-1 with the >> usual "Initial release (Closes: )" line. > > You don't need to keep current changelog entries. > If you want to keep it, then version should be with epoch like 1:1.1-1. > I'd like to avoid keeping old entries before uploading, mainly because I'd like to avoid uploading a version with an epoch. > >> > and don't specify "testing", you should set "unstable" or "experimental" >> > if you don't have special reason (i.e. release managers ask you) >> >> I know. It's testing because my repo is for testing. It'll be fixed >> before uploading in the archive. > > Okay, but stay to set "unstable" is good manner in that case. > > >> > Please submit ITP request to BTS and get its number, then put it as >> > (Closes: #nnnnnn) >> > >> >> will do today. > > Thanks! > submitted as bug #695575. Arnaud -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
