On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 at 11:04, Domenico Andreoli <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 09:10:53AM -0700, Tianon Gravi wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 at 08:45, Domenico Andreoli <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:50:31PM +0200, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote: > > > > debian/eol:* is where the stable but EOL'd images are built / live > > > > > > When a similar thing happened with Fedora, the images got updated so > > > to point to the RPM archives location. > > > > > > I can also post a PR/MR/patch but don't know where. > > > > > > > We've thought about doing so in the images, but made the very intentional > > choice not to so that users can in turn make a similarly explicit choice > to > > stay on EOL base images (instead of accidentally doing so). In Docker in > > particular, this works well because the "switching cost" from the > debian:* > > images to the debian/eol:* images is typically very low (changing a line > in > > a Dockerfile). > > I tried with that but I got this error: > > Pulling docker image debian/eol:10 ... > WARNING: Failed to pull image with policy "always": Error response from > daemon: manifest for debian/eol:10 not found: manifest unknown: manifest > unknown (manager.go:238:0s) > > Did I do it wrong? > Yeah, try "debian/eol:buster" (see https://oci.dag.dev/?repo=debian/eol for available tags) ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4
