In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I agree that 99.99% accurate spam filtering would also be useful. [But, >as an aside, my experience with some other software is that keeping it at >that level requires a fair amount of maintenance -- it's a moving target.]
Yes, it does require ongoing maintenance. Less that cleaning up the spam that was getting through to the BTS before though. With proper tools, all it takes is a human to review the borderline cases and decide what is spam or not. (and ajusting other spamassasin rules that are causing problems.) As the filters are trained, the number of borderline cases drops. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.