[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes ("Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge"): > I don't think the ctte should be recommending how to vote. [...]
Manoj Srivastava writes ("Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge"): > I agree with the first part of this. [...] > I strongly feel we should not be in the position of advising > people how to vote. [etc] Well, thanks people, but it seems that we probably don't have enough consensus to issue anything really concrete. And we're rather late now anyway. But, Manoj, thanks a lot for agreeing with this: > > * Of the General Resolution currently being voted on, the effects > > as we see them on the Sarge release process are as follows: > > B,D,E: Sarge will go ahead (software quality permitting). C: > > Sarge will be delayed to remove certain non-free items not > > covered by the grandfather clause (see below). > > A: Sarge will go ahead if it can be done by 2004-09-01. F: > > Sarge will be delayed to remove the non-free `non-software'. > > OK so far. (Although your MUA seems to have mangled it slightly.) Ian.