On 2/27/06, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like your improvement to the first paragraph, so if I may I would > like to accept that as a change to my original proposal (which has > been voted down anyway).
No problem -- that fits with my intention. > I would be happy to place your version over Further Discussion, but I > still prefer mine (with the modification to para 1.) > > JOOI, why did you delete: > > AND THE COMMITTEE THEREFORE REQUESTS AS FOLLOWS > ... > > 10. The Policy Manual maintainers should take steps to adjust the > language regarding main and contrib to clarify and improve it. The > Maintainers should take our opinion in paragraphs 7 and 8 as > advisory; they should also have regard to opinions from the Leader > about the correct effect. > > ? Oops. That was an artifact of the quoting you used and the mail client I used. I had not intended to remove that paragraph. if I had been more careful, I would have noticed its absence and would have included it. I withdraw my proposal as originally stated, since it was incomplete. Please feel free to incorporate its text in another proposal. Thanks, -- Raul