On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:39:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Raul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060923 22:59]: > > On 9/21/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >In order to claim this as a reason for not excluding the package from main, > > >yes, absolutely. That doesn't mean the converse is true, though, so we > > >still need to refine further to decide which side of the line ndiswrapper > > >belongs on -- so far we only have two tests which don't apply to > > >ndiswrapper. :)
> > I understand that some people don't want ndiswrapper in Contrib, > > because it is free software and it might be used to develop other > > free software. However, every piece of software in Contrib is free > > software, and can be used to develop other free software. > It is not what I would like to have. The issue is: > The maintainer has done a decision. Some people don't like that > decision. So, are we going to overrule the maintainer's decision? No, the maintainer has said that it's his intention to refer this decision to the TC to be settled. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
