On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:11:51PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > reassign 438179 glibc > thanks > > The Technical Committee has decided as follows: > > 1. RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not be applied to IPv4 addresses > by Debian systems, and we DO overrule the maintainer. > 2. RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not be applied to IPv6 addresses > by Debian systems. We do NOT overrule the maintainer. > 3. We recommend to the IETF that RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should be > abolished for IPv4, and that it should be reconsidered for IPv6. > > The supermajority requirement for overruling the maintainer was met. > > To the glibc maintainer: would you like to take responsibility for > implementing the Committee's decision, or would you prefer someone to > make an NMU ?
Next time, please Cc: the maintainer if you want to be sure to have an answer (hopefully I have seen that the bug has been reassigned). Please DON'T NMU the glibc, we will do the necessary in the next upload to unstable. Does this also apply to stable? -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]