On Sat, 08 Dec 2007, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:17:02PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > We had servers that ended up with twice or three times the number of > > users than other servers in the rotation
> Do you know when this was? The only data for other OSes we've seen [0] > seems to indicate that most of them don't actually use rule9. Unless > we can assume Debian and Ubuntu users made up a significant proportion > of OFTC users, and that the versions of Debian and Ubuntu in use at the > time implemented rule9. I don't know the exact dates, but somewhen in the first half of 2006. About in the middle of the year I looked into the issue for a bit and filed two bugs against irssi and xchat, asking that they randomize the result of getaddrinfo()[1]. It's probably a fair assumption that a significant number of our users are using a Debian-based operating system. > [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2007/09/msg00049.html I'm a bit confused by this code or rather its result, mainly because it seems that on all the etch hosts I tried it the results are distributed (even if not evenly) over the set of IP addresses, yet this discussion suggests that etch is affected by the Rule 9 issue. On sid the result usually consists of a single address returned all 1000 times. | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ python [..] | >>> print dict([ (l, k.count(l)) for l in k ]) | {'144.144.144.144': 66, '64.64.64.64': 67, '160.160.160.160': 66, | '224.224.224.224': 134, '208.208.208.208': 67, '96.96.96.96': 67, | '112.112.112.112': 66, '128.128.128.128': 67, '176.176.176.176': 67, | '80.80.80.80': 66, '48.48.48.48': 67, '192.192.192.192': 66, | '16.16.16.16': 67, '32.32.32.32': 67} Peter 1. http://bugs.debian.org/374715 http://bugs.debian.org/385374
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature