Josip Rodin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 03:31:13PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > > > If it were possible, (temporarily) adding a securty.d.o mirror in > > > > > > the > > > > > > 0.0.0.0 - 127.255.255.255 range would be helpful [...] > > > > > > Obviously finding a host that can deal with 13.53 MB/s of sustained > > > > > > traffic with a useful IP address to temporarily test this behaviour > > > > > > might be difficult. :) > > > > > > > > > > Quite. > > > > > > > > We might actually be able to help with this > > > > > > Did you mention this to DSA, they'd have to configure it at this end? > > > > I may be dumb, but what would another IP address for an existing > > security mirror that is already the preferred one buy us? I would > > expect that a second machine in the 128.* zone would be able to > > spread the load better. > > See above - just temporary for purposes of demonstration. > > Though I think that the case is already clear, but to eliminate any doubt > whatsoever...
Ok, no objection. Noah, please allocate such an IP, configure an alias eth, keep it for a while and remove it again after max. 1 month (hope that gives Joy enough time). In the long term, it may be helpful to acquire another US (uni) based security mirror. Joy, if you know of a site that had good bw and is willing to sponsor host + bandwidth, please let me know. Regards, Joey -- We all know Linux is great... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds. -- Linus Torvalds Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]