* Goswin von Brederlow (goswin-...@web.de) [090810 00:17]: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec#Filesystem layout > > I believe wine is the first package that is experimenting with using > that.
I belive wine is rather totally broken as of now: a...@ries:~$ dpkg-deb --contents pool/main/w/wine/libwine-nas_1.1.24-2_i386.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2009-08-09 09:05 ./ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2009-08-09 09:05 ./usr/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2009-08-09 09:05 ./usr/share/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2009-08-09 09:05 ./usr/share/doc/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2009-08-09 09:05 ./usr/share/doc/libwine/ lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2009-08-09 09:05 ./usr/share/doc/libwine-nas -> libwine a...@ries:~$ > I want to be clear here. The plan I gave is the transition plan from > ia32-apt-get to multiarch. I think you missed the bit about "accepted by the community at large". Changes like multiarch cannot just be driven by a single person without any buyin. > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/07/msg00060.html - > > ftp-masters on removal > > Also about the dpkg/apt diversion and taking over ia32-libs. Or so I > assumed. That mail was following the discussion on irc [...] I'm not going to say now that I think that the ftp-team had the best strategy for communicating that decision. That doesn't make the decision wrong however. I'm definitly not going to override a decision just for the reason that the way it was taken wasn't optimal, especially if after careful review the decision seems to be the right one. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org