Guillem Jover writes ("Re: draft ballot: please rule on how to implement
debian/rules build-arch"):
> In the thread in debian-policy I also proposed [0] another small variation
> for this, which would imply a two stage transition, reducing the immediate
> simultaneous FTBFS. Jakub Wilk provided numbers [1] for the possible FTBFS
> on the non-staged scenario.
...
> [0] <http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2011/06/msg00026.html>
> [1] <http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2011/06/msg00018.html>
Thanks. In [1] you say:
> - Lintian doesn't warn about missing build-* targets yet, so many
> maintainers are not aware that their package are affected by this issue.
Is this still true ? If so I think we should definitely fix this
right away. No matter what the eventual transition plan is, we
definitely want this to be at least a Lintian warning. So a change to
Lintian now to warn about this situation is a no-brainer I think.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20012.29742.386556.921...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
