Ian Jackson wrote: > Jonathan Nieder writes ("Bug#614907: nodejs/node command conflict: reasons to > include the command in each package"):
>> There is a transition plan and patch for the (ham radio) node in >> #614907. Nobody has been able to demonstate any appreciable problems >> with renaming it. Indeed, noone has demonstrated any likely reason >> for its "node" command to be run directly. > > The fact that the ham radio people have made a transition plan must > not be allowed to become a weapon in the hands of the other > wrongdoers. I made that plan and am neither a ham radio person nor a Node.js person. Make of that what you will. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120502231131.GC32660@burratino