Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder writes ("Bug#614907: nodejs/node command conflict: reasons to
> include the command in each package"):
>> There is a transition plan and patch for the (ham radio) node in
>> #614907. Nobody has been able to demonstate any appreciable problems
>> with renaming it. Indeed, noone has demonstrated any likely reason
>> for its "node" command to be run directly.
>
> The fact that the ham radio people have made a transition plan must
> not be allowed to become a weapon in the hands of the other
> wrongdoers.
I made that plan and am neither a ham radio person nor a Node.js
person. Make of that what you will.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120502231131.GC32660@burratino
